This website is designed to be viewed with web browsers that support
web standards.
The content of this page should still be accessible on older
browsers or other devices though visual formatting may be basic.
Deadlines
- Assignment Tuesday 24 March
- Deadline Thursday 7 May 10.00am
Contents of the Portfolio
The portfolio should be composed of the following items.
The portfolio should be written as a coherent document, so
that the different items support the conclusion made in the
final essay, and so that it collectively display that you have
covered the full range of the module contents.
-
A selection of answers to four of the weekly exercises,
as follows:
- One of Week 1 or 2 (Spatial Domain)
- One from Week 3-5 (JPEG Domain)
- One from Week 6-9 (non-lab exercise)
- One free choice
-
A concluding essay (1 page, maybe 2), summarising the highlights of
what you have learnt in the module.
You should address some of the following points
-
Why are the chosen highlights particularly important/interesting
for you?
-
How do these highlights relate to other topics you have studied?
-
How do the highlights relate to real-world applications
(such as your future career)?
-
How have the other items in the portfolio helped you to learn
(or show that you have learnt) these highlights?
You should make an effort to make (especially) the concluding
essay in view of the assessment criteria.
Format of submission
-
A single PDF file containing your main answers to all the items
as well as the concluding essay.
The front page should display full name and URN.
Source code does not have to be included here.
-
An archive file (tar/gz, tar/bzip, or PKzip) containing all your
m-files (and other source code and executable files if appropriate).
-
A print of the PDF file, with a standard front page as for any
other piece of coursework.
The electronic files should be sent as email attachments to
H.Schaathun@surrey.ac.uk;
use `CSM25 Portfolio Submission' as the subject.
It is helpful if the attachments specify file names consisting of
your family name, main given name, and urn.
The printed report should be submitted to the p/g office.
The paper copy will be returned to you with comments.
Assessment Criteria
- less than 40
-
Clearly failed to reach the learning objectives.
- 40-50
-
Sufficient descriptive understanding is demonstrated in some
of the items, but the student has failed to cover a sufficient
range of the lectured material.
- 50-60
-
The portfolio shows a declarative and procedural understanding
of the material lectured.
- 60-70
-
Declarative and procedural understanding as above.
Sound structure with clear focus and (almost) no irrelevant material.
Some attempt has been made to see the covered material in context,
but not quite at the level of a distinction.
- 70-80
-
Structure and understanding as above.
Sound evaluations with good arguments.
Connections are drawn between the different problems included,
and the material is put into context.
Opinions are backed by sound arguments.
- 80-90
-
Structure, understanding, and argumentation as above.
The student is clearly aware of his own learning from the module,
and can see this in relation to real-world challenges, other
modules studied, and/or future career plans.
- 90-100
- Beyond any expectation
![[Filler]](/images/umiext.jpg)